PAST CMPL SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS |
|||
| Unmarkable1 | ||
| BigxSipx18 | ||
| For3and1 | ||
| dbake333 | ||
| ChiCubs39 | ||
|
| hotshotnate2 | ||
| RyanPelley | ||
| For3and1 | ||
|
| RyanPelley | ||
|
| hotshotnate2 | ||
Chiefs/raiders
5 posters
Chiefs/raiders
Cjok1051 Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:41 am
Raiders get:
S.Holmes
L.Moore
Major
Bolts 2nd
Chiefs 2nd
Chiefs get:
Blackmon
Cluster
Kam
Raiders 1st
(Both teams agree)
S.Holmes
L.Moore
Major
Bolts 2nd
Chiefs 2nd
Chiefs get:
Blackmon
Cluster
Kam
Raiders 1st
(Both teams agree)
Cjok1051- Posts : 363
Join date : 2012-03-21
Re: Chiefs/raiders
headstrong Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:42 pm
OUCH. W hat's the point of this?
Downgrade at WR, S.
Kam > Major
McCluster = Moore
Blackmon > Holmes
1st > 2 2nds
Ouch. Nuff said. To think this guy wanted Mayo AND Denarious Moore for Blackmon.
Downgrade at WR, S.
Kam > Major
McCluster = Moore
Blackmon > Holmes
1st > 2 2nds
Ouch. Nuff said. To think this guy wanted Mayo AND Denarious Moore for Blackmon.
headstrong- Posts : 84
Join date : 2012-11-18
Re: Chiefs/raiders
Biblical_Beastn Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:13 pm
Writing 'both teams agree' doesn't mean anything till cal writes agree
Biblical_Beastn- Posts : 503
Join date : 2012-03-21
Location : Bay Area -
clutch28- Posts : 243
Join date : 2012-06-02
Re: Chiefs/raiders
jeffjk123 Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:48 pm
I think it should stand. Moore is actually nearly as good as welker now after update. Its a fair deal
Who cares this doesnt mess up the competitive balance of the league and Cal thinks those two wr will help them (which they will alot mcclister sucks) then let it stand.
Who cares this doesnt mess up the competitive balance of the league and Cal thinks those two wr will help them (which they will alot mcclister sucks) then let it stand.
Last edited by jeffjk123 on Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:40 pm; edited 3 times in total
jeffjk123- Admin
- Posts : 681
Join date : 2012-03-20
Re: Chiefs/raiders
Cjok1051 Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:06 pm
I refuse to adjust this trade. Holmes and especially Moore are being undervalued, as far as that goes so it major. So if his is voided by 3 admins than I just want it reversed.
Cjok1051- Posts : 363
Join date : 2012-03-21
Biblical_Beastn- Posts : 503
Join date : 2012-03-21
Location : Bay Area -
Re: Chiefs/raiders
Cjok1051 Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:47 pm
Biblical_Beastn wrote:Veto. 1/3
Which means it would need two more admin vetoes to not go through. 3 other admins have looked at it and were okay with the trade. Just FYI folks.
Cjok1051- Posts : 363
Join date : 2012-03-21
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Madden 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|